Keyhole vs open surgery for tennis elbow: which offers better pain relief?

NCT ID NCT07648849

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This trial compares two surgical approaches for tennis elbow that has not improved after at least six months of non-surgical treatments like rest or physical therapy. One group receives keyhole (arthroscopic) surgery, while the other receives traditional open surgery. The main goal is to see which method provides better pain relief after the procedure.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance

surgery (arthroscopic or open release)

What this could lead to

If one technique proves better, it could become the preferred surgical option for stubborn tennis elbow, offering clearer guidance for patients and surgeons.

What could go wrong

This is a small, single-center trial with only 50 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. Surgery carries standard risks like infection or nerve damage.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for TENNIS ELBOW are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

epicondylitis

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.