Video call or Face-to-Face? study tests which genetic counselling works best

NCT ID NCT04738708

Recruiting now Knowledge-focused Sponsor: National Cancer Centre, Singapore Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study compares genetic counselling done by video (telegenetics) with traditional in-person sessions for people at risk of hereditary breast, ovarian, or colorectal cancer. Researchers will measure how well patients understand their options, their emotional responses, and the overall cost. The goal is to see if video counselling is a good alternative that saves time and money.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to: If successful, this could show that telegenetics is as effective as in-person counselling, making genetic counselling more accessible and cheaper for patients.
What could go wrong: This is a small, early-stage study (150 participants) comparing two counselling methods, not testing a new treatment. Results may not apply to all populations or settings.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for GENETIC COUNSELLING are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Lynch syndrome

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

GENETIC COUNSELLING

Contacts and locations

Locations

National Cancer Centre Singapore
RECRUITING

Singapore, 169610, Singapore

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.