Which brain surgery saves more lives? new study aims to find out
NCT ID NCT04229966
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looks at 2,000 people with a type of brain bleed called an epidural hematoma to see which surgery works best. Researchers will track recovery over time using a scale that measures how well people can function. The goal is to find the safest and most effective surgical approach.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
About 2,000 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Nov 2020
- Expected to finish
-
Dec 2027
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
The population who were diagnosed with acute epidural hematoma and necessary for undergoing evacuation of an acute epidural hematoma.
- Ages
-
18 to 65 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Clear medical history of traumatic brain injury; 2. within 12 hours after injury; 3. Supratentorial unilateral acute epidural hematoma on first head CT scan examination; 4. The admitting neurosurgeon considers that the epidural hematoma needs to be evacuated with surgical treatment; 5. With informed consent to surgery and trial participation. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Previous intracranial surgery prior to trauma; 2. Patients with a score of 3 on the GCS, with bilateral fixed and dilated pupils, bleeding diathesis or defective coagulation, or an injury that was deemed to be unsurvivable; 3. CT demonstrates associated other intracranial hematomas e.g. subdural, intracerebral hemorrhage, or large size infarction, which are the main causes of operation; 4. Patients who had injury of the oculomotor nerve; 5. Severe pre-existing disability or severe co-morbidity which would lead to a poor outcome even if the patient is supposed to a good recovery from the TBI; 6. Pregnant female.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Craniotomy are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Department of Neurosurgery, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
RECRUITINGShanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Could a steroid injection double as a painkiller for brain surgery?
- Can a new patch safely protect the brain after surgery?
- Could IV tylenol replace opioids after brain surgery?
- New ICU strategy skips sedatives, uses only painkillers after brain surgery
- Bone glue could replace metal screws in skull surgery
- Brain surgery aftermath: new study tracks fluid leak risks