Which breathing strategy best prevents lung collapse during robotic bronchoscopy?

NCT ID NCT05714033

Completed Knowledge-focused Sponsor: M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Aug 12, 2026 · Updated 2 times

Summary

This study compares two breathing techniques used during robotic bronchoscopy, a procedure to biopsy lung nodules. The goal is to see which method better prevents atelectasis (lung collapse) during the procedure. About 62 adults with suspicious lung nodules will be randomly assigned to one of two ventilation strategies. The study tracks side effects and aims to improve safety and outcomes for patients undergoing this type of biopsy.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to: If successful, this could establish a safer, more effective breathing method during robotic bronchoscopy, reducing lung collapse and improving patient recovery.
What could go wrong: This is a small, early-stage study (62 participants) focused on comparing two procedures, not testing a new drug or cure. Results may not apply to all patients or settings.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for LUNG are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

lung disorder lung neoplasm

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

LUNG PULMONARY

Contacts and locations

Locations

M D Anderson Cancer Center

Houston, Texas, 77030, United States

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.