Which putty preserves your jawbone best? new trial tests two graft materials

NCT ID NCT05484492

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study tested two different bone graft putties—one made from donated human bone and one synthetic—to see which better preserves the jawbone after a tooth is pulled. Thirty adults who needed a tooth removed and planned to get a dental implant took part. After 4 months, the researchers measured bone width, height, and soft tissue thickness, and checked a small bone sample under a microscope to see how much new bone had formed.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance

bone graft putty (either demineralized/mineralized allograft or synthetic calcium phosphosilicate)

What this could lead to

If successful, this could help dentists choose the best graft material to preserve jawbone for future dental implants.

What could go wrong

This is a small, early-phase trial with only 30 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. The grafts may not show a clear difference in healing or bone quality.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ALVEOLAR BONE RESORPTION are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • University of Louisville

    Louisville, Kentucky, 40202, United States