Speed-Based training may boost athletic skills better than fixed weights

NCT ID NCT07249203

First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study looked at two ways of doing resistance training in 20 male university athletes over 8 weeks. One group used a velocity-based approach (adjusting weights based on movement speed), while the other used a fixed percentage of their maximum strength. Researchers measured jumps, sprints, agility, and leg strength before and after training to see which method worked better.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
resistance training (velocity-based or percentage-based)
What this could lead to
If it works, this could help coaches and athletes choose more effective training methods to improve speed, power, and agility.
What could go wrong
This is a small, early-stage study with only 20 participants, so results may not apply to all athletes. The findings are about training approaches, not a medical treatment.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ATHLETIC PERFORMANCE are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Istanbul Gelişim University

    Istanbul, 34310, Turkey (Türkiye)

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.