Which rectal cancer treatment leads to better surgery outcomes?
NCT ID NCT06212128
First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study looked at 57 patients with rectal cancer to compare surgical outcomes from three different treatment approaches: the RAPIDO protocol (short-course radiation plus chemotherapy), standard long-course radiation with chemotherapy, and surgery alone. Researchers measured things like operation time, blood loss, and recovery. The goal was to see if the newer RAPIDO approach leads to better or worse surgical results compared to the other two methods.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for RECTAL CANCER are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Digital nurse companion: could an app ease the burden of chronic illness?
- Which rectal cancer surgery preserves quality of life better? a study investigates
- AI as a surgical Co-Pilot: predicting difficulty in rectal cancer
- Can AI learn to grade endoscopy quality from video?
- Can precision protons spare rectal cancer patients from harsh side effects?
- A new radiation combo may spare the rectum in early cancer