Which rectal cancer surgery preserves quality of life better? a study investigates

NCT ID NCT07764120

First seen Aug 13, 2026 · Last updated Aug 14, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study looks at people who had surgery for advanced lower rectal cancer, comparing two procedures: one that removes the rectum and anus (requiring a permanent stoma) and one that removes the rectum but keeps the anus (with a reconnection). The goal is to see which approach leads to a better quality of life more than three years after surgery. Researchers will use questionnaires to measure overall well-being, bowel function, and urinary and sexual health. The findings could help doctors and patients choose the best surgical option.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to
If one surgical approach proves better for quality of life, it could guide surgeons in choosing the best technique for future patients with advanced lower rectal cancer.
What could go wrong
This is a small, single-center retrospective study, so results may not apply broadly. Also, quality of life is subjective and can be influenced by many factors beyond the surgery type.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for LOCALLY ADVANCED ADENOCARCINOMA OF THE LOWER RECTUM are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.