Simpler tooth treatment may spare kids from more invasive dental procedure

NCT ID NCT06524921

First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compared two treatments for severely decayed baby molars in children aged 4 to 9. One group received a pulpotomy, where only the infected part of the tooth's nerve is removed and replaced with a special cement (Biodentine). The other group had a full pulpectomy, removing all nerve tissue and filling the canals with a medicated paste (Metapex). The goal was to see if the simpler pulpotomy works as well as the more involved pulpectomy in preserving the tooth and preventing pain or infection.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Biodentine (calcium silicate cement) and Metapex (calcium hydroxide iodoform paste)
What this could lead to
If successful, this could show that a less invasive pulpotomy with Biodentine is a good alternative to full pulpectomy for treating infected baby teeth in children.
What could go wrong
This is a small, completed trial with only 28 participants, so results may not apply to all children. The study also excludes teeth with severe symptoms, limiting its scope.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for DENTAL CARIES are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Cairo University

    Cairo, Egypt

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.