Which filling base lasts longest? a Head-to-Head test

NCT ID NCT07762651

First seen Aug 13, 2026 · Last updated Aug 14, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This trial tests five different materials placed beneath composite fillings in back teeth to see which one best supports the filling and keeps it firmly attached. Adults needing a standard back-tooth filling will receive one of the five materials at random. Dentists will check the fillings over 18 months to see how well each material holds up, aiming to find the most reliable option for everyday dental care.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
dentin replacement materials (Biodentine, ACTIVA BioACTIVE, glass ionomer cement)
What this could lead to
If one material proves superior, it could lead to longer-lasting, more durable tooth fillings for cavities, reducing the need for re-treatment.
What could go wrong
This is a small, early-stage trial, so results may not apply to all patients. The materials could perform differently in real-world conditions, and long-term outcomes beyond 18 months are unknown.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for COMPOSITE RESINS are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University

    Tanta, Tanta, 31527, Egypt

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.