Which filling lasts longer in Kids' teeth? a Head-to-Head test

NCT ID NCT07761897

First seen Aug 12, 2026 · Last updated Aug 13, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This trial tests three types of tooth-colored fillings in children's baby molars to see which performs best. It compares a preheated bulk-fill composite with two indirect composite systems, looking at how well they hold up, how they look, and whether they cause any problems. The study includes healthy children aged 4 to 10 with cavities in their back teeth. The goal is to find the most durable and aesthetically pleasing option for restoring primary teeth.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Preheated thermoviscous bulk-fill composite and two indirect composite systems used for dental restorations
What this could lead to
If successful, this could identify which filling material lasts longer and looks better for children's baby teeth, improving dental care for kids.
What could go wrong
This is a small, early-stage trial, and results may not apply to all children. Fillings can fail over time, and the study's follow-up period may be too short to capture long-term outcomes.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CARIES CLASS II are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Izmir Katip Celebi University

    Izmir, Çiğli, 35640, Turkey (Türkiye)

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.