A sharper eye on prostate cancer return: PSMA PET vs. MRI

NCT ID NCT07766122

First seen Aug 14, 2026 ยท Last updated Aug 14, 2026

Summary

This pilot study investigates whether a PSMA PET scan, using an injected radiotracer, can detect clinically significant prostate cancer recurrence one year after focal HIFU treatment, compared with the standard MRI. About 30 men with prostate cancer who meet specific criteria will undergo both imaging tests, followed by a prostate biopsy as the gold standard to confirm any recurrence. The goal is to see if PSMA PET is as accurate as MRI in spotting cancer that has come back, which could improve monitoring after focal therapy.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only โ€” not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
PSMA PET scan with an injected radiotracer
What this could lead to
If PSMA PET proves as accurate as MRI, it could offer a more reliable way to detect prostate cancer recurrence after focal therapy, potentially guiding earlier and more precise follow-up care.
What could go wrong
This is a small pilot study, so results may not be conclusive. PSMA PET might not match MRI's accuracy, and the radiotracer injection carries minor risks like allergic reactions or radiation exposure.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for PROSTATE CANCER (DIAGNOSIS) are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • University Hospital of Toulouse

    Toulouse, France

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.