New scan may better spot ovarian cancer tumors before surgery
NCT ID NCT03965481
First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study compares two types of imaging scans—PET/MR and contrast-enhanced CT (CECT)—to see which one better locates ovarian cancer tumors in the abdomen. Researchers aim to find out if PET/MR can more accurately predict whether tumors can be fully removed during surgery and how patients will respond to chemotherapy. The trial involves 21 women with known or suspected ovarian cancer who are eligible for laparoscopic evaluation.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could show that PET/MR scans are more accurate than standard CT scans for guiding surgery decisions in ovarian cancer.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, early-phase study with only 21 participants, so results may not apply to all patients. The scans are for diagnosis only and do not directly treat the cancer.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for MALIGNANT OVARIAN NEOPLASM are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
M D Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Digital therapy aims to tame the fear that haunts cancer survivors
- New PET tracer could spot cancers that standard scans overlook
- Can a mesh shield ovarian cancer patients from painful hernias?
- Two-Drug combo targets Hard-to-Treat ovarian cancer
- Can Mind-Body techniques and drugs ease stress during ovarian cancer surgery?
- Gene therapy safety check: 400 cancer patients monitored for years