New study aims to find the best blade for each Patient's airway

NCT ID NCT07370883

First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 2 times

Summary

This study will compare two types of videolaryngoscope blades (hyperangulated vs. Macintosh) in 524 adults undergoing general anesthesia to see which leads to higher first-attempt intubation success. The goal is to develop a predictive algorithm that personalizes blade selection based on individual airway features, potentially reducing complications and improving safety.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to
If successful, this could lead to a personalized algorithm that helps doctors choose the best videolaryngoscope blade for each patient, potentially improving first-attempt intubation success rates.
What could go wrong
This is an early-stage study (not yet recruiting) focused on device comparison and algorithm development, not a treatment. Results may not apply to all patient groups or emergency settings.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for AIRWAY ASSESSMENT are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.