Gum treatment showdown: which method is safest for your whole body?

NCT ID NCT07077122

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 26, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compares five different non-surgical treatments for advanced gum disease (periodontitis) to see how they affect inflammation throughout the body and the risk of bacteria entering the bloodstream. Researchers will measure blood markers like C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 before and after treatment in 75 adults. The goal is to identify which treatment approach causes the least immediate systemic burden, helping improve safety and outcomes for patients.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Scaling and root planing, antibiotic prophylaxis (amoxicillin), 810nm diode laser, air polishing
What this could lead to
If successful, this could help dentists choose the safest gum treatment method that minimizes short-term risks like bacteria entering the bloodstream.
What could go wrong
This is a small, early-stage study (75 people) focused on measuring immediate effects, not long-term outcomes. Results may not apply to all patients or lead to new treatments.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for PERIODONTITIS are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Department of Periodontology, Dental School of Athens

    RECRUITING

    Athens, Greece

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.