Pacemaker lead position may cut heart rhythm complication
NCT ID NCT06023784
First seen Sep 21, 2026 · Last updated Sep 21, 2026
Summary
Researchers compare two ways of placing a pacemaker lead in people with atrioventricular block, a condition where the heart's electrical signal is blocked. One method, left bundle branch area pacing, aims to mimic the heart's natural activation; the other, right ventricular pacing, is the traditional approach. The trial tracks how many participants develop new-onset atrial fibrillation, along with heart function, hospitalizations, and quality of life. About 530 adults with a slow or blocked heartbeat take part.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- left bundle branch area pacing compared with right ventricular pacing
- What this could lead to
- If left bundle branch area pacing lowers the rate of new atrial fibrillation, it could become the preferred pacing method for people with atrioventricular block.
- What could go wrong
- This is a single-center study, so its results may not apply everywhere. Pacemaker procedures carry small risks of infection, bleeding, or lead problems, and the trial may not show a clear difference between the two methods.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 530 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Sep 2023
- Expected to finish
-
Dec 2030
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 85 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Adult patients aged 18-85; * AV block patients with ventricular pacing indications and the expected rate of ventricular pacing(VP)\> 40%, including (a) third-degree AV block; (b) second degree AV block (type II); (c) intermittent advanced AV block with expected VP\>40%; (d) symptomatic first degree AV block and PR interval on ECG \> 300ms; * Signed informed consent; Exclusion Criteria: * Baseline echocardiographic assessment of patients with impaired LV function (LVEF\<50%); * Patients with the history of atrial fibrillation; * Having difficulties in follow-up: Those who cannot accept 2-year follow-up on time due to physical condition or other reasons; * Pacemaker replacement without new implanted ventricular electrodes; * Surgery is required within 1 year due to severe structural heart disease; * Patients with tricuspid mechanical valve replacement, or congenital heart disease (including transposition of the great arteries, or permanent left superior vena cava, etc); * AV block resulting from: (a) Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy(HCM), (b) ventricular septal defect repair, and those who are unlikely to achieve successful LBBAP procedure.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Atrial fibrillation are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Peking Union Medical College Hospital
RECRUITINGBeijing, Beijing Municipality, 100730, China
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can exercise tame atrial fibrillation? trial tests workouts on heart rhythm and fitness
- Can a smarter pacemaker lead save the Heart's pumping power?
- Can zapping the heart beat drugs for AF in heart failure?
- Heart hole or stroke trigger? global registry tracks who gets closure and what happens next
- Two ways to quiet a racing heart: trial pits hybrid ablation against standard catheter treatment
- Stroke's hidden heart rhythm clue under investigation