Real-World data may reveal best Second-Line options after immunotherapy fails in lung cancer

NCT ID NCT07596524

First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study will look back at medical records of 300 people with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose disease got worse after first-line immunotherapy. Researchers want to see which second-line treatments were used and how well they worked in real-world practice. The goal is to help doctors choose better treatments for patients after immunotherapy stops working.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to
If successful, this study could provide clearer guidance on which second-line treatments work best for advanced lung cancer patients after immunotherapy fails.
What could go wrong
This is an observational study, not a controlled trial, so it cannot prove cause and effect. Results may be influenced by patient selection and real-world variability.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for LUNG CANCER (NSCLC) are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Cancer Hospirtal, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100021, China

  • Cancer Hospirtal, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shenzhen

    Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518116, China

  • Shanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital

    Taiyuan, Shanxi, 030013, China

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.