Microwave ablation vs. radiotherapy: which Non-Surgical option works best for early lung cancer?

NCT ID NCT07722182

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting This study
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jul 23, 2026 · Last updated Jul 24, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This trial compares two treatments for early-stage lung cancer in patients who cannot have surgery: microwave ablation delivered through a bronchoscope versus standard stereotactic body radiotherapy. The goal is to see which approach better controls the tumor over two years, with fewer side effects and less burden on patients. One hundred participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two treatments and monitored with regular CT scans.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
navigation bronchoscopy-guided microwave ablation or stereotactic body radiotherapy
What this could lead to
If one treatment proves better or less burdensome, it could become a new standard option for patients with early-stage lung cancer who cannot undergo surgery.
What could go wrong
This is a phase 2 trial with only 100 participants, so results may not be definitive. Both procedures carry risks such as bleeding, infection, or radiation side effects.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Phase 2

Tests whether the treatment actually works, and watches for side effects, in a larger group.

Participants

About 100 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Expected to start

Aug 2026

An estimate. Start dates often move.

Expected to finish

Dec 2029

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * 1\. Adults aged 18 years or above. 2. Clinically stage IA NSCLC suitable for definitive local therapy, defined as T1N0M0 with maximum tumour diameter 3 cm or less, based on routine staging work up and multidisciplinary team review. 3\. Pathological confirmation of NSCLC by histology or cytology whenever feasible. If tissue confirmation is not feasible or poses unacceptable risk, eligibility may be allowed after multidisciplinary consensus that imaging and clinical features are highly consistent with primary lung cancer, consistent with SBRT guidance for selected unbiopsied cases. 4\. Medically inoperable status, or patient declines surgery after multidisciplinary discussion, and both navigation bronchoscopy-guided microwave ablation and SBRT are considered acceptable treatment options by the treating teams (clinical equipoise). 5\. Target lesion technically suitable for both modalities, including feasibility and safety for bronchoscopy-based ablation and suitability for SBRT planning and delivery. 6\. Willing and able to provide informed consent and accept random assignment to either navigation bronchoscopy guided microwave ablation or SBRT, and able to comply with the follow up schedule. Exclusion Criteria: * 1\. Evidence of lymph node involvement (N1 or higher) or distant metastases (M1) on routine staging. 2\. Multiple synchronous primary lung cancers requiring different local strategies, or inability to define a single index lesion for primary endpoint assessment. 3\. Prior thoracic radiotherapy that would overlap the planned SBRT field, or prior local therapy to the index lesion. 4\. Another active malignancy that is likely to confound outcome assessment (for example, malignancy requiring systemic therapy or expected to limit 2-year survival), except adequately treated non melanoma skin cancer or in situ carcinoma with negligible recurrence risk. 5. Contraindications to bronchoscopy sedation or anaesthesia that preclude RAB or ENB guided ablation, or medical conditions that preclude SBRT positioning or safe delivery. 6\. Lesions judged unsafe or technically infeasible for either modality (for example, proximity to critical structures beyond predefined safety limits), as determined by the procedural and radiation oncology teams. 7\. Pregnant or breastfeeding women. 8. Inability or unwillingness to comply with study procedures or follow up.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Adults with clinically stage IA NSCLC suitable for definitive local therapy are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

How to take part

Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.

  1. The places running it

    1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.

  2. The official record

    ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.

    Open the record ↗

  3. A doctor treating you

    A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Prince of Wales Hospital

    Hong Kong, Hong Kong

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.