Which wrap works best? trial pits two hiatal hernia surgeries Head-to-Head

NCT ID NCT07718828

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now This study
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jul 22, 2026 · Last updated Jul 23, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This trial compares two common laparoscopic surgeries—Nissen fundoplication (full wrap) and Toupet fundoplication (partial wrap)—for treating hiatal hernia with acid reflux. About 200 adults aged 18 to 90 will be randomly assigned to one procedure. Researchers will measure pain, quality of life, hospital stay, and whether reflux returns, to see if one approach offers better outcomes.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication or laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication
What this could lead to
If one technique proves better, it could reduce pain and improve quality of life for people needing hiatal hernia surgery.
What could go wrong
This is a single-center trial with 200 participants, so results may not apply to all patients. Both surgeries carry standard surgical risks like infection or complications.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

About 200 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Started

May 2023

Expected to finish

Jan 2027

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 to 90 years

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Patients aged 18 to 90 years * Patients diagnosed with primary hiatal hernia by fibrogastroscopy and/or barium swallow examination * Patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease * Patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair with fundoplication * Patients able to provide informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Patients younger than 18 years or older than 90 years Patients with recurrent hiatal hernia Patients who are not suitable for general anesthesia Patients who prefer a surgical approach other than laparoscopic surgery Patients who are unable or unwilling to provide informed consent

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Hiatal hernia large are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

How to take part

Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.

  1. The places running it

    1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.

  2. The official record

    ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.

    Open the record ↗

  3. A doctor treating you

    A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • UMHAT Sofiamed

    RECRUITING

    Sofia, Sofia-Grad, 1517, Bulgaria

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.