Neck pain showdown: which mobilization technique wins?

NCT ID NCT06927154

Completed Symptom relief Sponsor: Riphah International University Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study compared two types of manual therapy—facet oscillatory mobilization and mobilization with movement—for people with chronic mechanical neck pain. Thirty-two adults aged 35-45 with neck pain lasting over six weeks participated. Researchers measured pain, neck movement, and disability to see which technique worked better.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance: mobilization techniques (facet oscillatory mobilization and mobilization with movement)
What this could lead to: If one technique proves more effective, it could offer a better non-drug option for easing chronic neck pain and improving mobility.
What could go wrong: This is a small, completed trial with only 32 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. The techniques are manual therapies, and benefits may vary.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CHRONIC MECHANICAL NECK PAIN are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

CHRONIC MECHANICAL NECK PAIN

Contacts and locations

Locations

Riphah International University, Malakand

Chakdara, KPK, 18800, Pakistan

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.