Expert eye test: can pathologists agree on melanoma?
NCT ID NCT05712551
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study brought together four expert skin pathologists to see how well they agree when diagnosing moles that might be melanoma. The goal was to create a reliable standard for future research. The experts reviewed images and discussed tricky cases to reach a consensus.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could help create a more reliable 'gold standard' for diagnosing melanoma, improving future research and training.
- What could go wrong
- This is a very small study with only 4 experts, so results may not apply broadly. It focuses on agreement, not on patient outcomes.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for MELANOMA (SKIN) are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Herlev University Hospital
Herlev, 2730, Denmark
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Astrophysics meets dermatology: AI that maps moles like stars to catch melanoma early
- Can a baseball league program help prevent skin cancer in rural kids?
- Could a common vitamin boost immunotherapy for melanoma?
- Skin in a dish could predict best melanoma drugs
- Online training could sharpen Pathologists' eye for melanoma
- Melanoma metabolism under the microscope: can energy use predict spread?