New study aims to Fine-Tune ventilator strategies for ARDS patients

NCT ID NCT07713420

Knowledge-focused Sponsor: Oriol Roca Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting This study
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jul 20, 2026 · Last updated Jul 21, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study looks at two bedside methods to measure how much of the lung can be reopened in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) who are on a ventilator. It also compares four different ways to set the ventilator's positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). The goal is to find which method best guides personalized ventilator care. About 30 adults with moderate-to-severe ARDS will take part.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to
If successful, this could help doctors better tailor ventilator settings for individual ARDS patients, potentially improving breathing support.
What could go wrong
This is a small physiological study with 30 patients, so findings may not apply to all ARDS cases. It does not test a treatment or directly improve outcomes.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

About 30 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Expected to start

Jul 2026

An estimate. Start dates often move.

Expected to finish

Jan 2029

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Intubated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS): PaO2/FiO2 ratio \<200, with bilateral infiltrates of non-cardiogenic origin, with a PEEP of at least 5 cmH2O. * The patient is receiving mechanical ventilation and continuous sedation. * The patient has an esophageal balloon. * Written informed consent signed and dated by the patient or one relative in case the patient is unable to consent, after a full explanation of the study by the investigator and prior to study participation Exclusion Criteria: * Patients with\< 18 years old * Pregnant woman * Lung recruitment maneuvers are deemed unsafe by the medical team * Unable to fit EIT belt due to patient size * Contraindications to EIT monitoring (e.g. burns, pacemaker, thoracic wounds limiting electrode placement) * Hemodynamic instability (Systolic BP \< 75 mmHg or MAP \< 60 mmHg despite vasopressors and/or heart rate \< 55 bpm) * Hypernatremia (Na+ \>145mEq/L) * The formalized ethical decision to withhold or withdraw life support * Patient under guardianship * Patients deprived of liberties * Impossibility to give informed consent by both patient and family (i.e. language barrier) * Patient was already enrolled in the present study in a previous episode of acute respiratory failure.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

How to take part

Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.

  1. The official record

    ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.

    Open the record ↗

  2. A doctor treating you

    A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.