New study aims to Fine-Tune ventilator strategies for ARDS patients
NCT ID NCT07713420
First seen Jul 20, 2026 · Last updated Jul 21, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study looks at two bedside methods to measure how much of the lung can be reopened in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) who are on a ventilator. It also compares four different ways to set the ventilator's positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). The goal is to find which method best guides personalized ventilator care. About 30 adults with moderate-to-severe ARDS will take part.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could help doctors better tailor ventilator settings for individual ARDS patients, potentially improving breathing support.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small physiological study with 30 patients, so findings may not apply to all ARDS cases. It does not test a treatment or directly improve outcomes.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 30 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Expected to start
-
Jul 2026
An estimate. Start dates often move.
- Expected to finish
-
Jan 2029
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Intubated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS): PaO2/FiO2 ratio \<200, with bilateral infiltrates of non-cardiogenic origin, with a PEEP of at least 5 cmH2O. * The patient is receiving mechanical ventilation and continuous sedation. * The patient has an esophageal balloon. * Written informed consent signed and dated by the patient or one relative in case the patient is unable to consent, after a full explanation of the study by the investigator and prior to study participation Exclusion Criteria: * Patients with\< 18 years old * Pregnant woman * Lung recruitment maneuvers are deemed unsafe by the medical team * Unable to fit EIT belt due to patient size * Contraindications to EIT monitoring (e.g. burns, pacemaker, thoracic wounds limiting electrode placement) * Hemodynamic instability (Systolic BP \< 75 mmHg or MAP \< 60 mmHg despite vasopressors and/or heart rate \< 55 bpm) * Hypernatremia (Na+ \>145mEq/L) * The formalized ethical decision to withhold or withdraw life support * Patient under guardianship * Patients deprived of liberties * Impossibility to give informed consent by both patient and family (i.e. language barrier) * Patient was already enrolled in the present study in a previous episode of acute respiratory failure.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can Real-Time lung imaging Fine-Tune ventilator care for ARDS?
- Can tailored breathing support and early muscle relaxants boost survival in ARDS?
- Immune clues may unlock better ECMO care for lung failure patients
- Can the right dose and timing of steroids save more lives in ARDS?
- New inflatable cushion could revolutionize ICU patient repositioning
- Tailored breathing support may reduce lung injury in ECMO patients