Lung biopsy without a breathing tube? small study tests a gentler approach

NCT ID NCT05722340

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jul 17, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This pilot study compares two ways to perform a lung biopsy for people with undetermined interstitial lung disease. One method uses a breathing tube and deep anesthesia (standard), while the other uses only mild sedation and numbing medicine. The goal is to see if the gentler method gives biopsy samples that are just as good for making a clear diagnosis. Only 24 adults will take part, and the study focuses on how confident pathologists are in their diagnosis from the tissue samples.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to
If successful, this could show that a less invasive anesthesia method (NIVATS) provides equally good biopsy samples for diagnosing lung diseases.
What could go wrong
This is a very small pilot study with only 24 participants, so results may not apply widely. The main goal is to compare biopsy quality, not to test a new treatment.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for LUNG DISEASES, INTERSTITIAL are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Département d'Anesthésie et Réanimation Cardiothoracique - CHU Arnaud de Villeneuve

    Montpellier, France

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.