New IVF method passes first long-term child development check
NCT ID NCT06369415
First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 26, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study followed 214 children born from two different fertility treatments—CAPA-IVM and conventional IVF—to see if their development and behavior at age 5 were similar. Researchers used parent questionnaires to assess communication, motor skills, problem-solving, and emotional health. The goal is to understand whether the newer CAPA-IVM method is as safe for children as standard IVF.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If this study shows no differences, it could provide strong evidence that CAPA-IVM is as safe as conventional IVF for children's long-term development.
- What could go wrong
- This is an observational follow-up, not a new treatment trial. Results may not apply to all fertility patients, and the study size is relatively small.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for DEVELOPMENT, CHILD are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Mỹ Đức Hospital
Ho Chi Minh City, Tan Binh, Vietnam
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can 'Abnormal' embryos still lead to healthy pregnancies? a new registry investigates
- Building a biological treasure trove to decode Women's health mysteries
- Can a sperm 'Quality Check' boost IVF success?
- Foam ultrasound for fertility checks: will women find it comfortable?
- A Hormone's hidden power: could progesterone be the key to unexplained infertility?
- A questionnaire to empower fertility patients — a pilot study puts it to the test