Laser vs radiofrequency: a new hope for knee pain relief?
NCT ID NCT07700784
First seen Jul 14, 2026 · Last updated Jul 15, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This trial tests whether using a laser to ablate (destroy) specific nerves around the knee provides better pain relief than the standard radiofrequency method for people with chronic knee osteoarthritis. Fifty adults with persistent knee pain will receive one of the two procedures under ultrasound guidance. The study measures pain intensity using a standard scale to see which technique offers superior relief.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- laser genicular nerve ablation or conventional radiofrequency genicular nerve ablation
- What this could lead to
- If laser ablation proves more effective or safer than radiofrequency, it could offer a new, less invasive option for managing chronic knee pain from osteoarthritis.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, early-stage trial with only 50 participants, so results may not apply broadly. Both procedures carry risks like infection or nerve damage, and pain relief may be temporary.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 50 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Expected to start
-
Aug 2026
An estimate. Start dates often move.
- Expected to finish
-
Sep 2027
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
A government agency
The lead sponsor is a government body.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
40 to 75 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Accepted
You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * American society of anesthesiologist's physical status class I, II- Body mass index (BMI): 18.5 - 29.9 kg/m2- Confirmation of knee OA on radiograph- Chronic knee pain ≥ 3 months. Exclusion Criteria: * History of clinically significant cardiac, hepatic, renal or neurological disease- Allergy to study medication- Coagulopathy- Infection at injection site
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Analgesia are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The official record
The full official record for this study. This one lists no contact details, but it is the first place any would appear.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Custom knee guides put to the test in obese patients
- Can a shot of your own blood ease arthritic knees?
- 5,000 knee arthritis patients tracked to crack the treatment code
- Can a local anesthetic injection curb Kids' pain after tonsil removal?
- Can a hydrogel injection ease knee arthritis pain?
- Weekly shot aims to melt away pounds in obesity fight