Nationwide study reveals how labor induction methods affect mothers and babies
NCT ID NCT02477085
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This completed French study looked at over 3,000 women whose labor was started artificially (induced). Researchers compared different methods like breaking the water, using hormones, or a balloon catheter. They tracked how often each method was used, how it affected the mother and baby, and whether women were satisfied. This is an observational study, not a test of a new drug or treatment.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for INDUCTION OF LABOR are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Locations
-
Port-Royal maternity unit, Cochin Hospital, Assistance publique des Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP
Paris, 75014, France
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Pill vs. gel: which works better for starting labor?
- Could a breast pump kickstart labor?
- Natural labor kickstart: could gentle methods replace medical induction?
- Castor oil cocktail may shorten labor for moms
- Steroid shot may shorten labor after water breaks
- Could a simple TENS device ease labor pain without drugs?