Battle of the stone busters: which kidney stone treatment wins?
NCT ID NCT07510178
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compares two common procedures—RIRS (a scope through the urinary tract) and ESWL (shock waves from outside the body)—to see which removes small kidney stones (up to 1.5 cm) in the lower part of the kidney more effectively. About 66 adults aged 18 to 60 with these stones will be randomly assigned to one treatment. The main goal is stone clearance, and researchers will also track side effects like infection and blood in urine.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 66 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Expected to start
-
Apr 2026
An estimate. Start dates often move.
- Expected to finish
-
Oct 2026
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 60 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria * Those patients will be included with lower calyceal renal stones and size up to 1.5 cm. * Patients' ages will be between 18 and 60 years. * Both genders will be included. Exclusion Criteria: * Untreated Urine culture positive will be excluded * Patients using anticoagulants and females with pregnancies and those lactating will be excluded. * Anatomical abnormalities like horseshoe kidney, duplex system, pelvic kidney, malrotated kidney, calyceal diverticulum, steep infundibulopelvic angle, infundibular stenosis, long infundibular length/narrow infundibular width, pelvic ureteric junction obstruction, ureterocele, and ureteral stricture will be excluded.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Renal stone are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation
Karachi, Sindh, 74200, Pakistan
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Which procedure wins for dense kidney stones?
- Which kidney stone procedure works best for dense stones? a Head-to-Head trial
- Can a back nerve block replace opioids for kidney stone pain?
- Kidney stone breakthrough? urine pH may predict shock wave success
- New study tests which laser technique clears kidney stones faster
- Robot takes on kidney stones in first human test