Light-Activated implant could mend Cancer-Weakened bones without major surgery

NCT ID NCT02373904

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early This study
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jul 15, 2026 · Last updated Jul 16, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study tests a device called the Photodynamic Bone Stabilization System for treating painful fractures or impending fractures in the upper arm bone (humerus) caused by cancer that has spread to the bone. The device is inserted into the bone and hardened with light to provide stability. The trial measures whether it reduces pain and improves daily function in adults with metastatic bone disease.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
a photodynamic bone stabilization system (a device that is inserted into the bone and hardened with light to stabilize fractures)
What this could lead to
If successful, this device could offer a less invasive way to stabilize arm bones weakened by cancer, reducing pain and helping people regain daily function.
What could go wrong
This is a small, early study with only 14 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. The device may not work for all fracture types or could have complications like infection or device failure.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

14 people

The number who actually took part.

Start date

Feb 2015

Finished

Jun 2017

Lead sponsor

A company

The lead sponsor is a pharmaceutical, biotech, or medical-device company.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: -General Inclusion Criteria 1. Skeletally mature adult males and females 18 years of age or older. 2. Impending or actual pathological fracture of the humerus, secondary to metastatic bone disease. 3. Females: neither pregnant nor intending to become pregnant during the course of the study, defined as: 1. Postmenopausal for at least 1 year OR 2. Documented oophorectomy or hysterectomy 3. Surgically sterile OR 4. If of childbearing potential, must be practicing double-barrier method of birth control, be willing to avoid pregnancy for the period of study participation and have a negative pregnancy test at screening 4. Able to understand and provide informed consent. 5. Willing and able to comply with post-operative treatment protocol and follow-up visit schedule. -Impending Fracture-Specific Inclusion Criteria 6. Documented presence of solitary metastatic lesion. 7. Mirels Criteria Score ≥ 8. 8. Destruction of cortical bone at impending fracture site \> 50%. -Actual Fracture-Specific Inclusion Criteria 9. Radiograph-confirmed diagnosis of acute, single isolated fracture of the humerus. AO classification 11A1, 11A2 and 11B1, 11B2 and 12A1,12A2 and 12B1, 12B2 and 13A1,13A2 and 13B1, 13B2. 10. Fracture is closed, Gustilo Type I or IIA. Exclusion Criteria: -General Exclusion Criteria 1. Primary tumor (osteogenic origin, etc.) at site. 2. Impending fracture or actual fracture location other than humerus. 3. Current concomitant traumatic fracture of any other location. 4. Active or incompletely treated infections that could involve the device implant site. 5. Distant foci of infection that may spread to the implant site. 6. Allergy to implant materials or dental glue. 7. Vascular insufficiency, muscular atrophy, or neuromuscular disease at implant site. 8. Uncooperative patients, or patients who are incapable of following directions (for example, as a consequence of a neurological or psychiatric disorder). -Impending Fracture-Specific Exclusion Criteria 9. Mirels Score \< 8. 10. Destruction of cortical bone at impending fracture site \< 50%. 11. Prior surgery and/or prior fracture of affected site. 12. Any articular component to impending fracture site. -Actual Fracture-Specific Exclusion Criteria 13. Index treatment is greater than 28 days post fracture. 14. Open fractures with severe contamination. 15. Extremely comminuted fractures where insufficient holding power of the balloon on the intramedullary canal is probable. 16. Delivery sheath is unable to cross fracture site after proper fracture reduction and realignment 17. Patients whose intramedullary canal at site of fracture measures smaller than the diameter of the sheath provided.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Humerus pathological fracture are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Johannes Wesling Klinikum Minden

    Minden, 32429, Germany

  • Lahn-Dill Kliniken

    Wetzlar, 35578, Germany

  • Medical Center Leeuwarden

    Leeuwarden, 8934 AD, Netherlands

  • Medical University of Vienna

    Vienna, 1090, Austria

  • Medisch Spectrum Twente

    Enschede, 7513 ER, Netherlands

  • St. Vinzenz-Hospital GmbH

    Cologne, D-50733, Germany

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.