Lost in translation: study probes language barriers in gynecologic cancer care
NCT ID NCT05971303
First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study gives questionnaires to patients, interpreters, and healthcare professionals to understand how language and cultural differences impact care for women with gynecologic cancer. The goal is to identify barriers and improve the patient experience. About 45 people will take part at a single cancer center in Toronto.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this study could reveal specific barriers faced by non-English-speaking patients with gynecologic cancer, pointing toward better communication and support strategies.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, observational questionnaire study at a single center. It does not test a treatment, so findings may not apply broadly or lead directly to changes in care.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for GYNECOLOGIC CANCER are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9, Canada
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a personalized exercise program boost recovery in cancer survivors?
- Quitting before the knife: which Stop-Smoking aid works best for cancer patients?
- Braids and conditioner may boost scalp cooling against chemo hair loss
- New imaging tool could help surgeons detect hidden cancer cells during surgery
- Could an ALS drug clear the fog of chemo brain?
- Could a chatbot help close the gap in genetic cancer testing?