Gentler breathing support may help preterm babies avoid breathing tubes
NCT ID NCT07693530
First seen Jul 09, 2026 · Last updated Jul 10, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This trial compares two noninvasive breathing support methods—heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula (HHHFNC) and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP)—in premature infants (born at 28-34 weeks) with moderate respiratory distress syndrome. The goal is to see which method better prevents the need for a breathing tube and mechanical ventilation in the first week of life. The study also tracks side effects like nasal injury and infections.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula (HHHFNC) and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP)
- What this could lead to
- If one method works better, it could reduce the need for invasive breathing tubes in premature babies, lowering risks of injury and infection.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, single-center trial, so results may not apply to all hospitals. Both methods are already used, so the difference may be small.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
86 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Jun 2020
- Finished
-
May 2022
- Lead sponsor
-
A government agency
The lead sponsor is a government body.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
28 to 34 weeks
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: Preterm infants admitted to the NICU who fulfilled all of the following were eligible: 1. Gestational age (GA) 28+0 to 34+6 weeks and/or birth weight 1,000-2,000 g 2. Clinical and radiological diagnosis of moderate respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) 3. Silverman-Anderson score (SAS) 4 \< SAS \< 7 4. Eligibility for noninvasive ventilatory support Exclusion Criteria: 1. Parental refusal of consent 2. Outborn infants transferred from other centers 3. Infants who required immediate intubation in the delivery room 4. Major congenital anomalies, chromosomal disorders, gastrointestinal malformations, or life-threatening congenital cardiac defects 5. Nasal/pharyngeal anatomical anomalies (choanal atresia, cleft palate/lip) 6. Moderate-to-severe hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (Grade 2-3) 7. Infants who died unexpectedly shortly after admission without respiratory evaluation
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Premature birth are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Kayseri City Hospital
Kayseri, Kayseri, 38090, Turkey (Türkiye)
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Evaluating cardiorespiratory development in premature babies
- Can early feeding shape a premature Baby's brain and body?
- Can group prenatal care with social support reduce preterm births?
- Could a higher steroid dose help preterm babies breathe easier?
- Can a reusable device match the standard for uterine biopsy?
- Early therapy may rewire motor development in premature infants