Hip surgery showdown: which approach poses fewer risks?
NCT ID NCT07345182
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looked at 225 older adults with hip fractures to compare two surgical methods: one through the side of the hip and one through the back. The goal was to see which approach leads to fewer dislocations or bone breaks during surgery. Results help surgeons choose the safest technique for each patient.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for FEMORAL NECK FRACTURES are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Ümraniye Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, Umraniye, 34764, Turkey (Türkiye)
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a Bone-Strengthening infusion given right after hip surgery prevent a second break?
- Home rehab after hip fracture: a new hope for independence?
- Could a simple education program be the key to better hip fracture recovery?
- Nerve block showdown: which eases hip fracture surgery pain best?
- New hip fracture fixation device put to the test against traditional screws
- Anesthesia choice may influence blood loss in hip fracture surgery