Which heart monitor catches more irregular beats? new study aims to find out
NCT ID NCT06250712
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jul 22, 2026 · Updated 2 times
Summary
This study compares two types of portable heart monitors in people who have symptoms of an irregular heartbeat (arrhythmia) but whose standard heart test was normal. About 588 participants will wear either a continuous ECG patch or use a handheld ECG device for one month. The goal is to see which device is better at detecting arrhythmias and to compare costs and quality of life.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ARRHYTHMIA are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Chonnam National University Hospital
RECRUITINGGwangju, Dong-gu Jaebongro 42, 61469, South Korea
-
Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital
RECRUITINGGyeonggi-do, Hwaseong-si Keunjaebong-gil 7, 18450, South Korea
-
Korea anam hospital
RECRUITINGSeoul, South Korea
-
Wonju Severance Christian Hospital
RECRUITINGWŏnju, Gangwon-do, 26426, South Korea
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Week-Long heart patch could Out-Sleuth standard 24-Hour monitor for palpitations
- Brain filter may prevent stroke during heart procedure
- New ECG technology aims to spot hidden heart disease before the first heart attack
- Massive heart study aims to sharpen diagnosis and cut needless hospital stays
- Can we predict who will benefit most from atrial fibrillation ablation?
- AI trained on 127,000 ECGs to predict deadly heart rhythms