Brain filter may prevent stroke during heart procedure

NCT ID NCT04685317

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now This study
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jul 21, 2026 · Last updated Jul 22, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study tests whether a filter device called the Sentinel Cerebral Protection System can prevent stroke and brain injury during ablation for atrial fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat). The device is placed in the arteries to catch debris that might break loose during the procedure. Researchers will compare brain scans and cognitive function between patients who receive the device and those who do not.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
a filter device called the Sentinel Cerebral Protection System, placed in the arteries to catch debris during ablation
What this could lead to
If effective, this device could reduce the risk of stroke and cognitive decline during atrial fibrillation ablation procedures.
What could go wrong
This is a small pilot study with only 48 participants, so results may not apply broadly. The device itself carries procedural risks, and it may not significantly reduce brain injury.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

About 48 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Started

Mar 2023

Expected to finish

Jun 2027

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Men / women over the age of 18 years undergoing radiofrequency, pulsed field or cryo-balloon ablation for AF in accordance with the current AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for management of patients with atrial fibrillation. This includes patients with symptomatic paroxysmal, persistent or long-standing persistent AF not responsive to or intolerant of a Class I or III anti-arrhythmic drug or patients with symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent AF prior to the initiation of a Class I or Class III antiarrhythmic drug). The decision to perform catheter ablation for AF will be made by the treating provider and the patient in accordance with the guidelines noted above. (January et al. J Am Coll Cardiol vol. 64, No. 21, 2014, page e1) * Able to provide informed consent. * Patients should have acceptable aortic arch anatomy and vessel diameters without significant stenosis as assessed using pre-procedure CT angiogram. Exclusion Criteria: * Anatomy unsuitable for use of Sentinel device: * Right extremity vasculature not suitable due to compromised arterial blood flow. * Brachiocephalic, left carotid or aortic arch not suitable due to excessive tortuosity, significant ectasia, stenosis (\>70%), dissection or aneurysm. * Cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack within six months * Carotid disease requiring treatment within six weeks * Unable or unwilling to provide informed consent. * Pregnant women * Known history of dementia. * Known hypersensitivity to nickel-titanium. * Presence of MRI non-compatible implanted devices including cardiac implantable electronic devices. * The presence of left atrial thrombus. All patients routinely undergo transesophageal echocardiogram prior to ablation and / or intra-cardiac echocardiogram at the beginning of the ablation procedure to rule out the presence of left atrial thrombus. * Patients with a reversible cause for AF such as hyperthyroidism.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Arrhythmia are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

How to take part

Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.

  1. The places running it

    1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.

  2. The official record

    ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.

    Open the record ↗

  3. A doctor treating you

    A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Mayo Clinic in Rochester

    RECRUITING

    Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.