Heart surgery monitoring under the microscope: is the standard test accurate enough?

NCT ID NCT07163052

First seen Jun 26, 2026 ยท Last updated Jun 26, 2026

Summary

This study will compare two ways of measuring pressure inside the heart during heart surgery: the gold standard (direct left atrial pressure) and a more common indirect method (pulmonary capillary wedge pressure). Researchers want to see if the indirect method is accurate enough to guide decisions about fluid management and heart support. About 136 adults having elective heart surgery will take part, and the results could improve how doctors monitor patients during and after surgery.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only โ€” not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to
If successful, this study could confirm that a less invasive pressure measurement is reliable enough for guiding treatment in heart surgery patients.
What could go wrong
This is an observational study, not a treatment trial. It may find that the two measurements do not agree well, meaning current practice needs rethinking but no direct patient benefit is guaranteed.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for AORTIC REGURGITATION are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.