Heart failure emergency: which drug works best first?
NCT ID NCT05276219
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study tests whether opening blood vessels (vasodilation) or removing fluid (diuretics) is better for treating sudden fluid buildup in the lungs from heart failure. About 1,100 adults with severe shortness of breath and low oxygen levels will receive one of three treatments in the emergency room. The goal is to see which approach keeps patients alive and out of the hospital longer over 30 days.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ACUTE HEART FAILURE are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Bispebjerg Hospital
RECRUITINGCopenhagen, Copenhagen, 2000, Denmark
-
Hvidovre Hospital
RECRUITINGCopenhagen, Copenhagen, 2650, Denmark
-
Nordsjællands Hospital
RECRUITINGHillerød, Denmark
-
Roskilde Hospital
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGRoskilde, Denmark
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a second diuretic boost recovery from heart failure?
- Can heart tissue reveal the secrets of heart failure?
- Can a single gene infusion rebuild failing hearts?
- Listening to patients: a study asks how to make heart failure care fairer
- Bedside flu shot for heart patients: a simple strategy to save lives?
- Could a sleep apnea machine keep heart patients out of the hospital?