Which heart test is best for women? new study aims to find out
NCT ID NCT04599192
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Sep 04, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study looks at 500 women with chest pain to compare two tests used during heart catheterization—FFR and iFR—to see which better predicts future heart problems like heart attacks or strokes. Participants will be followed for 5 years. The goal is to improve how doctors decide on treatment for women with heart disease.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
About 500 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Apr 2019
- Expected to finish
-
Aug 2028
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
Adult female patients (\>18 years of age) presenting with suspected myocardial ischemia or acute coronary syndrome for evaluation of ischemia by non-invasive stress testing and coronary angiography.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Female participants only
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Female ≥ 18 years old at signing of informed consent 2. Suspected myocardial ischemia or acute coronary syndrome 3. Indication for non-invasive perfusion imaging study 4. Indication for diagnostic catheterization 5. Eligible for PCI 6. Signed informed clinical procedural consent by subject or by surrogate Exclusion Criteria: 1. Inability to receive adenosine or regadenoson (for example, severe reactive airway disease, marked hypotension, or advanced atrioventricular block without pacemaker. 2. Severe cardiomyopathy (ejection fraction \<30%) 3. Extremely tortuous or calcified coronary arteries precluding FFR/iFR measurements 4. Patients with left main coronary artery disease requiring revascularization 5. Female of child baring age should have negative pregnancy test 6. Subject is pregnant or breast feeding, or planning to become pregnant 7. Contraindication to non-invasive stress imaging including severe claustrophobia, renal disease with GFR \<30 where CMR is indication, any metal in the body which is a contraindication to CMR, allergy to gadolinium contrast 8. ICD or PPM
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Cardiac catheterization are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Yale University School of Medicine - Section of Cardiology
New Haven, Connecticut, 06520, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- A shot of nicorandil before stenting might keep blood flowing
- Paper craft may calm children before heart procedures
- Can a common gout pill shield hearts after stents?
- A 7,000-Person trial asks: is lifelong aspirin necessary for older hearts?
- Are Europe's heart patients getting the right prevention care? a massive survey aims to find out
- Can a heart injection grow new blood vessels?