Dental implant showdown: which placement method wins for accuracy?

NCT ID NCT07174791

Ongoing Knowledge-focused Sponsor: Mansoura University Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 26, 2026

Summary

This study compares two techniques for placing dental implants in people with no teeth: fully guided (using a surgical guide) and partially guided. Sixteen participants will receive implants in both jaws, and researchers will measure how accurate the implant positions are and how well the final teeth fit. The goal is to see which method leads to better results for long-lasting dental work.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to: If successful, this could help dentists choose the best method for placing dental implants, leading to better-fitting and longer-lasting teeth replacements.
What could go wrong: This is a small, early-stage study with only 16 participants. Results may not apply to everyone, and the main focus is on measurement accuracy, not long-term health outcomes.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for COMPLETE EDENTULISM are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

anodontia

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

COMPLETELY EDENTULOUS IMPLANT ASSESMENT

Contacts and locations

Locations

Mansoura University, Faculty of Dentistry, mansoura, egypt

Al Mansurah, Mansoura, Egypt

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.