Is fusion necessary? new trial tests if simpler back surgery works just as well

NCT ID NCT05273879

First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compares two surgical approaches for single-level lumbar spinal stenosis: decompression alone versus decompression with spinal fusion. Researchers will track 86 patients aged 45-75 over two years to see if the simpler procedure works just as well. The goal is to determine whether fusion is truly needed, which could reduce surgical risks and costs.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to
If successful, this study could show that decompression alone is just as effective as decompression plus fusion, potentially sparing patients from unnecessary surgery.
What could go wrong
This is a relatively small trial (86 participants) and results may not apply to all patients. The non-inferiority design means it can only show that one approach is not worse than the other, not that it is better.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Pirogov National Medical and Surgical Center

    RECRUITING

    Moscow, Moscow, 105203, Russia

  • Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine

    RECRUITING

    Moscow, Moscow, 107045, Russia

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.