Could a simple stool test replace colonoscopy for cancer surveillance?
NCT ID NCT06983639
First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study compares two ways to monitor people who have had polyps removed from their colon: a fecal test that checks for blood in stool versus a standard colonoscopy. Researchers want to see if the simpler stool test is just as good at catching new cancers or high-risk polyps. About 4,000 participants will be followed over time to compare cancer rates and deaths between the two approaches.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Fecal occult blood test (FIT) and colonoscopy
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could show that a simple stool test is as effective as colonoscopy for follow-up, reducing the need for invasive procedures.
- What could go wrong
- This is a large but early-stage comparison; the stool test may miss some cancers or polyps that colonoscopy would find, and results may not apply to all patients.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for COLORECTAL ADENOMA are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Sørlandet sykehus HF
RECRUITINGArendal, Agder, 4838, Norway
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a plasma beam stop colon polyps from coming back?
- Can delivering cancer drug directly to the liver shrink tumors?
- A simple blood draw could spot colorectal cancer early
- Can a dental floss loop make polyp removal faster?
- Peer power: could community education boost cancer screening?
- AI eye for colonoscopy: could software catch what doctors miss?