New study tests which breathing tube tool works best for C-Sections

NCT ID NCT07667010

First seen Jun 27, 2026 ยท Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study aims to see if it's possible to run a larger trial comparing two types of video laryngoscope blades used to help with breathing during cesarean sections under general anesthesia. The blades differ in their curve: one has a gentle curve (Macintosh-style) and the other has a more pronounced curve (hyperangulated). Researchers will enroll 100 pregnant patients undergoing emergency or urgent C-sections to test recruitment, adherence, and data completeness.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only โ€” not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to
If successful, this study could pave the way for a larger trial that determines which blade type is safer or more effective for intubation during cesarean sections.
What could go wrong
This is a small feasibility study, not designed to prove which blade is better. It may not recruit enough participants or show clear differences between the blades.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for AIRWAY ANESTHESIA are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Mount Sinai Hospital

    Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X5, Canada

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.