Stents or bypass? 10-Year study aims to settle the debate for heart patients

NCT ID NCT07308860

First seen Jan 09, 2026 · Last updated Jun 22, 2026 · Updated 38 times

Summary

This study follows 1,500 patients with multivessel coronary artery disease who were randomly assigned to receive either coronary stenting guided by fractional flow reserve or coronary bypass surgery. Researchers will compare survival, quality of life, and chest pain relief over 10 years to determine which approach offers better long-term outcomes.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Stanford University

    Stanford, California, 94305, United States

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to

If successful, this could help doctors choose the best long-term treatment for patients with multiple blocked heart arteries.

What could go wrong

This is an observational follow-up, not a new treatment test. Results may not apply to all patients, and individual risks like complications from either procedure remain.

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

Angina Pectoris coronary artery disorder Death myocardial infarction stroke disorder

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.