Please sign in to follow a disease.
Which balance test best predicts falls in Parkinson's? a head-to-head comparison
NCT ID NCT07148700
First seen Jul 09, 2026 · Last updated Jul 10, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study compares three different ways to assess fall risk in people with Parkinson's disease: a machine-based balance test, a self-reported confidence questionnaire, and a functional balance exam. Researchers will track falls over six months in 40 participants with mild to moderate Parkinson's. The goal is to determine which tool most accurately predicts who will fall, helping clinicians choose the best assessment method.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this study could help doctors choose the best tool to predict falls in Parkinson's patients, potentially reducing injuries and improving quality of life.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, observational study (40 people) that compares existing tools rather than testing a new treatment. Results may not apply to all Parkinson's patients.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
40 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
May 2025
- Finished
-
Aug 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
Participants diagnosed with PD by a neurologist and meeting the following criteria
- Ages
-
40 to 80 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Age between 40 and 80 years old * Receiving stable dopaminergic treatment * No other neurological disorders besides PD * A Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score \>24 * Hoehn and Yahr stage between 1-3 * Voluntarily agreed to participate in the study after receiving detailed information Exclusion Criteria: Presence of visual, hearing impairments, cardiovascular or pulmonary diseases that could affect study outcomes * Having mental or physical impairments severe enough to hinder communication * Clinically unstable condition within the past month * Participation in a rehabilitation program within the last six months
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Parkinson are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Bezmialem Vakif University
Istanbul, Eyup, Turkey (Türkiye)
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Comparison of effectiveness of benzhexol and procyclidine in improving tremor in tremor predominant Parkinson's disease patients
- Simulator-Based assessment of driving performance in patients with Parkinson's disease and multiple sclerosis
- Individualized 130 hz subthalamic temporal interference stimulation versus medication for motor symptoms in parkinson disease
- Parkinson's improvement activated by hula understanding (PAHU) - part 2
- Half a million people join quest to decode Parkinson's risk
- A genetic roadmap for Parkinson's: testing thousands to unlock clues