Which esophageal cancer surgery leads to better quality of life? large study aims to find out

NCT ID NCT00260559

Recruiting now Knowledge-focused Sponsor: University of Pittsburgh Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study compares how patients recover and feel after two types of surgery for esophageal cancer: minimally invasive (smaller cuts) versus open surgery. Researchers will track quality of life, pain, and daily function for up to three years in 3,500 participants. The goal is to see which approach leads to a better long-term quality of life.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ESOPHAGEAL CANCER are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

esophageal cancer Esophageal Neoplasms

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

ESOPHAGEAL CANCER ESOPHAGECTOMY

Contacts and locations

Locations

UPMC - Hillman Cancer Center
RECRUITING

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15232, United States
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center - Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery
RECRUITING

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.