Back surgery pain relief: simple nerve block cuts morphine use?
NCT ID NCT04473508
First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study tested whether a nerve block using the drug ropivacaine could reduce pain and the need for morphine after lumbar spine surgery. Fifty adults having back surgery received either the nerve block or a placebo (salt water) in addition to standard anesthesia. The goal was to see if the block leads to less pain and fewer side effects after the operation.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- ropivacaine
- What this could lead to
- If it works, this could offer a simple way to reduce pain and the need for strong painkillers after back surgery.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, single-center study with only 50 participants. The nerve block may not work better than placebo, and there is a risk of side effects like nausea or bleeding.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Phase 3
Large-scale testing in a bigger group. Usually the last step before a treatment can be approved.
- Participants
-
50 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Nov 2019
- Finished
-
Sep 2021
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 80 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * age\> 18years and \<80 years * lumbar spine surgery (2-4 levels) * posterior approach * ASA 1-3 Exclusion Criteria: * refusal * age \< 18yrs * \<50 kg and \>120 kg * pregnant * renal or hepatic severe desease * ASA 4 * no French speaking * emergency surgery * local or systemic infection * surgical resumption of the surgical site * surgery involving a thoracic approach * allergy to local anesthetics
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Adverseevent are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
CHU Nimes
Nîmes, Gard, 30 000, France
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Which blood pressure drug protects organs better during spine surgery?
- Can a video call replace a hospital visit for spine surgery recovery?
- Can a common mineral keep spine surgery safer?
- A new wash could outsmart spine surgery infections without the seroma risk
- Can a ketamine boost during surgery slash opioid needs?
- Could fear of movement slow spine surgery recovery?