Veterans with lung cancer get weekly check-in calls to boost quality of life
NCT ID NCT07219251
First seen Jun 27, 2026 ยท Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study tests whether regular phone support from a trained lay health worker can improve quality of life for veterans with lung cancer. 194 veterans will either receive usual care or weekly calls for 6 months. The goal is to see if this extra support helps with healthcare planning, symptom management, and overall well-being.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only โ not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Lay Health Worker (LHW) support
- What this could lead to
- If it works, this could show that regular phone support from a trained non-medical helper improves quality of life for veterans with lung cancer.
- What could go wrong
- This is a relatively small, early-stage behavioral study. The support may not lead to meaningful improvements, and results may not apply to non-veterans.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for LUNG ADENOCARCINOMA are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System (VAPAHCS)
RECRUITINGPalo Alto, California, 94304, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a smart drug home in on Hard-to-Treat cancers?
- Exercise as medicine: tailored workouts may rebuild strength after cancer
- Family support may be key to easing lung cancer surgery stress
- Can a drop of blood predict disease years before it strikes?
- Blood, urine, and stool may hold the key to predicting a serious side effect of lung cancer treatment
- Can AI be a Pathologist's second opinion?