Keyhole surgery showdown: which technique works best for slipped discs?

NCT ID NCT07151651

Not yet recruiting Knowledge-focused Sponsor: Sohag University Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 26, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compares two minimally invasive surgical techniques—uniportal and biportal endoscopy—for treating a single-level lumbar disc herniation. Sixty adults aged 18-70 with persistent symptoms will be randomly assigned to one of the two procedures. The main goal is to see which technique provides better pain relief and surgical outcomes.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance: Endoscopic lumbar discectomy (surgical procedure)
What this could lead to: If successful, this could help surgeons choose the best endoscopic technique for treating herniated discs, potentially improving pain relief and recovery.
What could go wrong: This is a small, early-stage comparative study with only 60 participants, so results may not apply to all patients. Surgical risks like infection or nerve damage still apply.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for LUMBAR DISC HERNIATION are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

Intervertebral Disc Displacement lumbar disk disease lumbar disk herniation, susceptibility to

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

LUMBAR DISC HERNIATION

Contacts and locations

Locations

Sohag University

Sohag, Sohag Governorate, 002, Egypt

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.