Keyhole vs. open: which emergency colon surgery is safer?
NCT ID NCT05005117
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compares two surgical methods for emergency colon removal: laparoscopic (keyhole) and open surgery. Researchers want to see which approach leads to fewer complications and better long-term survival. The trial involves 192 adults who need emergency colon surgery, excluding trauma patients and those under 18.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for COLORECTAL CANCER are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Marie Grönroos-Korhonen
Lahti, 15850, Finland
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a plasma beam stop colon polyps from coming back?
- A stitch in time: could a device make abdominal closure safer?
- Can we predict chemo brain before it happens?
- Your gut bacteria might reveal hidden cancer risk
- Can a smart digital program restore sleep for cancer survivors?
- Can a new infusion drug shrink Hard-to-Treat tumors?