Can a 4-Minute chat rival a Dietitian's hour for heart health?
NCT ID NCT05772325
First seen Jul 08, 2026 · Last updated Jul 09, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study tests whether a short, standardized 4-minute heart-healthy talk is as effective as a full 60-minute personalized session with a dietitian for lowering LDL cholesterol and improving diet. Participants are adults aged 30–80 with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, or spondyloarthritis who have an elevated risk of heart disease. The goal is to see if a quick, easy approach can help manage heart disease risk in people with inflammatory joint conditions.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- dietary counseling
- What this could lead to
- If it works, this could show that simple, brief dietary advice is as effective as personalized counseling for improving heart health in people with inflammatory joint disease.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small study with only 70 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. Dietary changes can be hard to maintain, and the brief advice may not be enough to produce lasting improvements.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 70 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Feb 2023
- Expected to finish
-
Dec 2026
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
30 to 80 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Accepted
You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Patients with either RA, PsA, or AS, between 30-80 years with an increased risk of future CVD, estimated using the CVD risk calculator. i.e. any risk \> 5 -10 % predicted by Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE2) algorithm. Also, patients with very high risk (predicted risk \>10%) as well as established atherosclerotic CVD (ASCVD) including previous myocardial infarction, coronary intervention (coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous coronary intervention), transient ischemic attack/strokes, atherosclerotic diseases of arteries as in the carotid artery or peripheral arterial disease (PAD) will also be included. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Heart failure with systolic EF\<40% 2. Kidney failure with GFR \< 35 3. Liver failure 4. Mental disorder rendering the patient unable to comply with the protocol 5. Being able to speak the language of the country 6. Reduced cognitive function 7. Substance abuse 8. Recent initiation or change in doses of lipid-lowering therapy or weight loss medication
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Ankylosing spondylitis are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Diakonhjemmet Hospital
Oslo, 0370, Norway
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Ocular surface changes and meibomian gland dysfunction in rheumatologic patients: a Cross-Sectional analytical study
- Hidden kidney damage may lurk in rheumatoid arthritis patients
- Can a new injection calm rheumatoid arthritis? an early trial puts ZB002 to the test
- Can a new knee implant design offer better Long-Term relief?
- Can a new biologic ease rheumatoid arthritis when standard drugs fail?
- Can a questionnaire capture the real burden of psoriatic arthritis?