Can ultrasound consistently measure the diaphragm? a study puts it to the test
NCT ID NCT07747532
First seen Aug 05, 2026 · Last updated Aug 06, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study looks at whether diaphragm ultrasound gives consistent results when performed by different anesthesiologists. Two doctors will each scan the diaphragm using three different methods, and their measurements will be compared to see which method is most reliable. The goal is to find a dependable way to assess diaphragm function, especially on the left side, which is often harder to image. Participants are adults having elective surgery, and the study focuses on improving measurement accuracy rather than testing a treatment.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Diaphragm ultrasound using three different measurement methods
- What this could lead to
- If reliable, this could help standardize diaphragm ultrasound, making it a more trustworthy tool for assessing diaphragm function in patients.
- What could go wrong
- The study is small and focuses on measurement consistency, not on patient outcomes. Results may not apply to all patient groups or ultrasound settings.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for DIAPHRAGM ISSUES are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network
Toronto, Ontario, M5T 2S8, Canada
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.