Tooth restoration showdown: which inlay lasts longer?
NCT ID NCT07265609
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study tested two different materials used to fix cavities in back teeth: a CAD/CAM composite and a polymer-infiltrated ceramic. Twelve adults with two decayed molars each received both types of inlays and were followed for two years. Researchers checked how well each material looked, worked, and held up using standard dental criteria.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for DENTAL CARIES are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University
Al Mansurah, Dakahliya, 35516, Egypt
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Could a simple WhatsApp nudge cut childhood tooth decay?
- Can a new filling material reduce Post-Dental-Work tooth pain?
- Which filling base lasts longest? a Head-to-Head test
- A cleaner look at cavities: does polishing or bleaching skew detection?
- Which filling lasts longer in Kids' teeth? a Head-to-Head test
- A new topical treatment may spare teeth from root canals